A Headstar Publication. http://www.headstar.com/eab/ .
Please forward this free bulletin to others (subscription details at the end).
++Issue 139 Contents.
- 01: Lack of Interoperability ‘Is Biggest Accessibility Barrier’ - But open standards being ignored, analyst warns.
- 02: Open University Media Player Passes Accessibility Test - Prototype works for deaf and dyslexic users, says developer.
- 03: Online Book Details Seven Steps To Web Accessibility - Guidance on basic measures all site owners should include. News in Brief:
- 04: Access Denied – European web access law campaign; 05: National e-Learning - online qualification in web accessibility;
- 05: Smart Prize – awards for disability apps.
- Section Two, The Inbox – Readers’ Forum:
- 06: Wrong Price – software cost and development barriers; 08: Patient Inspiration – health records collaboration.
- Section Three: News Analysis - International Law.
- 07: Prospects Brighten For Copyright Exception Treaty – after years of wrangling, an international treaty on allowing accessible versions of copyrighted works to be shared across borders is edging closer. Dan Jellinek reports.
++Section One: News.
+01: Lack Of Interoperability ‘Is Biggest Accessibility Barrier’.
The biggest barrier to making make the web more accessible to disabled people is interoperability, Sandi Wassmer, member of the UK government's e-Accessibility Forum, told delegates at e- Access '11 conference in London last month (http://www.headstar.com/eaccess11 ).
Interoperability is “about having disparate and diverse devices that all communicate with each other,” Wassmer said. “To use a non technical way of explaining it, a postage stamp is interoperable. We have a system that everyone agrees upon around the world. The stamp makes sure your letter gets from here to where it's going. It's a system which is different in each country, but it is interoperable on a global scale.”
Without interoperability, inclusive design – creating websites of value to everyone - will fail, she said. “We can design inclusively all we want, but if I have one device that does one thing and you have another that does something different, if we don't achieve interoperability, we won't be able to connect.”
The key to interoperability is the use of the open standards created by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and its accessibility arm, the Web Accessibility initiative (WAI), Wassmer said. However, although the consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) are fairly widely followed by web designers and developers, two other key sets of guidelines - the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) which cover software used to create web content such as content management systems, blogs and social media; and the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines (UAAG), which cover software that displays web content such as web browsers and media players, have not yet been widely adopted, she said. Instead, the market is allowed to dictate how features are added to web browsers or social media networks, for example.
“People don't really care about [ATAG and UAAG] as it is a case of market forces. To me, this is really what needs to be resolved before we can have an inclusive web.”
Meanwhile a range of new government initiatives relating to access to ICT by disabled people were announced at the conference by Minister for Culture, Communications and Creative Industries Ed Vaizey and his senior digital inclusion policy adviser, including a new online forum to discuss key issues with government. For coverage from our sister publication E-Government Bulletin, see: http://www.headstar.com/egblive/?p=951
And for Sandi Wassmer’s slides and other presentations and transcripts from e-Access ’11, visit: http://www.slideshare.net/group/eaccess-11-presentations
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=609
+02: Open University Media Player Passes Accessibility Test.
An online video and audio player being developed by the Open University (OU) for its students and the wider learning community has successfully passed through a round of accessibility testing including testing with deaf and dyslexic users, E-Access Bulletin has learned.
The generic media player, currently viewable as a ‘work in progress’ in alpha or prototype format ( http://embed.open.ac.uk/demo?theme=ouice-dark ), is being developed to allow the distance-learning university greater control over the technology used to access it extensive bank of podcast material (http://podcast.open.ac.uk ).
The OU’s 200,000 students are likely to begin using the player on the university’s virtual learning environment by the end of this year or the start of next, according to Nick Freear, a web developer in the OU’s Institute of Educational Technology. It will also feature on ‘OpenLearn’, an open educational resources portal where anyone can access hundreds of online learning materials for free ( http://openlearn.open.ac.uk ).
Eventually the source code for the accessible player might be opened up, Freear said. “but that’s down the line.”
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=611
+03: Online Book Sets Out Seven Steps To Web Accessibility.
An ‘online book’ setting out the first seven steps that any website owner or developer should take towards making their site accessible to people with disabilities was unveiled last month by the OneVoice for Accessible ICT Coalition, an umbrella group of accessibility and technology organisations.
'The First Seven Steps to Accessible Websites' ( http://www.onevoiceict.org/tools/tools/seven-steps ) was launched at the recent e-access 11 conference, co-hosted by the coalition with E-Access Bulletin publisher Headstar (http://www.headstar.com/eaccess11 ).
The seven were chosen as the most important first practical steps that should be taken by most websites, and are all relatively easy to implement, the book’s author Peter Abrahams, Accessibility Practice Leader at Bloor Research, told the conference.
The steps are grouped into two types, Abrahams said.
Steps 1, 2 and 3 are ‘setting the scene’ steps. Step 1 is to do a quick accessibility check of a website: “We provide a methodology for doing that to give you an indication of whether your website is very accessible, reasonably accessible, partially accessible, or is an absolute nightmare. “ Step 2 is to publish an accessibility policy, and Step 3, is to provide a way for people to give feedback on any problems encountered.
The next four steps represent a few basic technical features that are most important for accessibility, for example helping people who navigate the web using keyboard only or blind people using text to speech screen-readers, he said.
Step 4 is providing a ‘jump to content’ link to allow people to jump over all the menus, adverts and “rubbish” that can clutter up a page and go straight to the main content. Step 5 is ensuring the tab sequence – jumping from link to link using the tab key – is logical; Step 6 is ensuring that pictures and links have alternative text; and step 7 is to ensure that text sizing works.
The book’s own website features a page for each step with background, information about implementation, links to good and bad examples, and instructional videos with closed captions, Abrahams said. Future plans include similar steps for accessibility of other technologies such as smartphones; and the building of an online community to discuss the continual refinement and development of the project, he said.
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=613
++News in Brief:
+04: Access Denied:
A proposal for a European law on accessible websites has been published by the European Disability Forum, an umbrella group of disability organisations across Europe, as part of a new campaign on web access, ‘Access Denied!’ Joining forces with AGE platform Europe, the European Blind Union and ANEC, the European consumer voice in standardisation, the forum is calling for the European Commission to propose binding EU legislation to ensure that public websites and websites delivering basic services of public interest are made accessible as soon as possible. The commission is due to make an announcement on the accessibility of public sector websites and ‘websites providing basic services to citizens’ later this year: http://www.edf- feph.org/Page_Generale.asp?DocID=13854&thebloc=18320 Short Link: http://bit.ly/oH4yOF
+05: National e-Learning:
What is claimed to be the first national qualification in web accessibility to be delivered through an online training course is to be launched in the Autumn by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, AbilityNet and BCS (the Chartered Institute for IT). To register your interest to participate in a pilot study for ‘Digital Accessibility – Web essentials’, contact: email@example.com
06: Smart Prize: A new European contest to promote the development of smartphone applications designed to improve the lives of disabled and older people has been launched by the Vodafone Foundation. The Smart Accessibility Awards will share a 200,000 euro prize fund between the best smartphone app in four areas: social participation, including access to social media; independent living, for helping users with everyday tasks such as opening a door; mobility, for enabling users to travel freely or use location services; and wellbeing, for applications which improve the users' health. Entries must be in by 15 October to be evaluated in November, with 12 finalists selected to present their application to a jury in Brussels in December at a live final, where the four overall winners will be chosen:
[Section One ends].
++Section Two: 'The Inbox'- Readers' Forum.
++Section Two: 'The Inbox'- Readers' Forum.
Please email all contributions or responses to: firstname.lastname@example.org .
+07: Wrong Price:
Our long-running debate on the price of access technology continues with a message from Allan Milne, Lecturer in Software Engineering at the University of Abertay in Dundee,
“I too agree that £800 for a screenreader is ridiculous, although I accept that the development costs are high and the current take-up population is low,” Milne says.
“I am voting with my money and moving from 25 years of Microsoft to Apple; I pay exactly the same as any other buyer and have free, out-of-the box accessibility through their built- in VoiceOver screenreader. I have already got my iPod Touch and am now in the throes of getting a Mac Book. However I would point out that Apple themselves are not perfect and somewhat hypocritical in that their iTunes software is entirely inaccessible when used with a Windows screenreader, and they do not have an accessible category for their apps.
“The other major issue I have is that as a software engineer, even with accessibility software the development environments are themselves often barely accessible, placing another barrier to blind people like myself trying to help ourselves by building accessible applications.
“Desktop and mobile platforms can be a great vehicle for enablement so come on computer hardware and software companies, get your acts together.”
[Further responses please to email@example.com].
+08: Patient Inspiration:
Jonathan Fisher, a reader from Surrey, writes in to say he will be spreading the messages from new work being developed by accessibility consultant and academic Dr Howard Leicester, who wrote in our last issue about his project to develop standards for more accessible patient records.
“What a greatly absorbing set of topics are dealt with in the latest bulletin,” Fisher writes.
“As a member of my local hospital’s disability access group, Ashford and St. Peter’s Foundation Trust, I am motivated to pass on the comments about patient information. I will be forwarding this bulletin to employed colleagues of this group.
“Like so many things, it seems to me that there are too many folks out there all trying to invent their own shaped wheel. As Surrey is a neighbouring county to Kent, it makes sense to me to try and promote collaboration.”
[Further responses please to firstname.lastname@example.org].
[Section Two ends].
++Sponsored Notice: Adept Transcription- Alternative Formats At Affordable Prices.
When you want alternative formats for disabled colleagues, customers and staff, call Adept.
Formats we produce include audio, audio description, Braille, BSL, Easy Read, e-docs for websites, large print, Makaton, Moon and sub-titles, at prices from a penny a word.
Whether handling a newsletter, training DVD, equality scheme, public service leaflet, contract or consultation, we provide: - One-stop shop for all formats - Products quality-checked by users - Corporate presentation including your house style - Fast turnaround of one document or thousands - Multi-format discounts - Accessible packaging
Contact us at: Tel: 0208 133 5418 (precede with 18001 for typetalk) Email email@example.com
[Sponsored Notice ends].
++Section Three: News Analysis- International Law.
+09: Prospects Brighten For Copyright Exception Treatyby Dan Jellinek.
The prospect of agreement on an international treaty to allow accessible versions of copyrighted works to be shared across borders, giving people with print disabilities wider access to books, has brightened following a recent meeting of the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).
At a specially-extended June session in Geneva of the organisation’s standing committee on copyright and related rights (SCCR), WIPO member states agreed to merge previously separated formal positions on the issue into a single draft document, clearing the way for treaty negotiations later this year, E-Access Bulletin has learned.
Before the meeting, discussion of the issue had been fragmented between four draft texts developed separately by the World Blind Union; a grouping of African countries; the EU; and the US. In the run-up to the June meeting, the WBU had facilitated the merger of these documents into a single new draft.
“That was a big success, as countries were no longer defending their own proposals,” Dan Pescod, WBU Vice Chair, told E- Access Bulletin this month. “We are pleased with the text – negotiation by committee is always a compromise, but we are 80% of the way towards an acceptable final text of a law.”
Areas of compromise in drawing up the single text include a softer wording on the relationship between the new copyright exception law and contract law, Pescod said. “We wanted something that made it very clear that contract law could not undermine copyright exceptions, but it has been left somewhat open to interpretation in the new text as currently worded,” he said. “It has left it to member states to decide how they address this issue, whereas the WBU does not want any rights-holder to be able to draw up a contract which removes the copyright exception.”
Another ongoing area of debate is the issue of which organisations will be permitted to send digital files across borders under the copyright exception, Pescod said.
Some rightsholder groups want a system of formal requirements to determine who can become such ‘trusted intermediaries’, and also which books can be sent and which ones can’t, he said. But the WBU would prefer a less formal system whereby ‘authorised entities’ would not have to be pre- approved, or gain fresh permission each time for individual titles.
The discussion now moves on to the next SCCR meeting on 21 November, where the detail of the final text could be decided, and a decision taken as to whether it will become a full international treaty or simply a ‘recommendation’.
The EU has been the biggest block on creation of a full treaty (see E-access Bulletin, April issue http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=581 ), with strong pressure from rightsholders in countries including France to resist any systematic exceptions to copyright law.
But this would represent double standards, Pescod said. “In the very same committee meeting this June, WIPO Member States agreed that a treaty on the protection of audiovisual performances should be concluded. We do not think print disabled people deserve a lesser solution.”
And you can comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=615
[Section Three ends].
++Sponsored Notice: Accessify Forum- Six Years of Accessibility Discussion.
Accessify Forum has been the number one destination for accessibility discussion on the web for nearly six years. Celebrating our sixth birthday next month, you’ll find discussion of accessibility at all levels, from beginner to guru.
The site has recently been redesigned and the forum system improved. This is still ongoing and you can join in the discussions.
So whether you’re looking to learn more about accessibility, want to help others and improve on your own knowledge, or just to browse the archives, come and join us at: http://www.accessifyforum.com/
[Special notice ends].
+How to Receive the Bulletin.
+How to Receive the Bulletin.
To subscribe to this free monthly bulletin, email firstname.lastname@example.org with 'subscribe eab' in the subject header. You can list other email addresses to subscribe in the body of the message. Please encourage all your colleagues to sign up! To unsubscribe at any time, put 'unsubscribe eab' in the subject header.
Please send comments on coverage or leads to Dan Jellinek at: email@example.com .
Copyright 2011 Headstar Ltd http://www.headstar.com . The Bulletin may be reproduced as long as all parts including this copyright notice are included, and as long as people are always encouraged to subscribe with us individually by email. Please also inform the editor when you are reproducing our content. Sections of the bulletin may be quoted as long as they are clearly sourced as 'taken from e-access bulletin, a free monthly email newsletter', and our web site address: http://www.headstar.com/eab is also cited.
- Editor: Dan Jellinek.
- Editorial advisors: Kevin Carey, Tristan Parker.
[Issue 139 ends].