A Headstar Publication. http://www.headstar.com/eab/ .
Please forward this free bulletin to others (subscription details at the end).
++Issue 141 Contents.
- 01: UK Charity Investigates Options To Back Disney Web Case - RNIB asks US lawyers if blind people here could join class action.
- 02: Digital Inclusion Course Closure ‘Sets Dangerous Precedent’ - Accessibility business case threatened, academic warns.
- 03: RNIB To Launch Largest Ever Web Testing Exercise - All UK local authority sites to be checked against new criteria. News in Brief:
- 04: Official Forum – UK government action plan to be
- 05: updated; 05:
- 06: Descriptive Guidance – TV and film help.
- Section Two, The Inbox – Readers’ Forum:
- 07: Refreshing Response - Braille unit software; 08: Google Gaps - new service grumbles.
- Section Three: Opinion - Accessible kids’ computer games.
- 08: Serious Fun: Blind and sight-impaired children have often been left out of the fun when it comes to computer games, writes Donna Jodhan. But progress is being made, and things are looking brighter...
++Section One: News.
+01: Uk Charity Investigates Options To Back Disney Webcase.
The UK’s leading charity supporting blind and partially sighted people RNIB is investigating whether people in the UK might be able to join a US class action against the Walt Disney Company for the alleged inaccessibility of its websites, E- Access Bulletin has learned.
On 29 June, California district judge Dolly Gee gave permission for three blind women - two from Southern California and one from Wichita, Kansas - to proceed with a class action against Disney alleging the company’s websites unlawfully include information which is visible to sighted users but not to screen reader programs, as well as options which are inaccessible to blind people such as the ability to make reservations and download electronic tickets.
Web accessibility is just one of five main areas of complaint being brought in the case, with others including issues in the theme parks themselves such as a lack of Braille maps. The plaintiffs are not seeking money damages, simply an injunction requiring Disney to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act by making its services accessible.
In her ruling judge Gee rejected as irrelevant arguments by Disney that the women could have accessed the same services and information elsewhere, and also rejected arguments that “there is no accepted accessibility standard”. In dismissing the latter argument she pointed out that nearly three years ago — "presumably when website accessibility standards were even less settled" – a similar action was allowed to proceed against the US retailer Target for alleged accessibility problems with its website Target.com (see http://www.forizs- dogali.com/pdf/Disney%20Certification%20Order.pdf ).
The three women are represented by Andy Dogali at Florida- based law firm Forizs & Dogali ( http://www.forizs-dogali.com/ ), alongside Los Angeles-based attorney Eugene Feldman ( http://www.californiadisabilitylawfirm.com/ ), with the case set for trial in Los Angeles in January 2012.
Talking to E-Access Bulletin this week Samantha Fothergill, senior legal policy officer at RNIB, said she had contacted the US lawyers handling the case to see if UK citizens could potentially play any part in adding an international dimension to the case.
“There is no recourse under UK law for the websites as you can only sue a website under the Equality Act if the provider is established in the UK, but because this is an international tourist attraction people from around the world, including Britain, could potentially be part of the US case.
“If so we might be able to find clients who had gone to those resorts, and could make people aware this action is going on – we would not be encouraging them to join, just passing on the information.”
UK class actions are rare in the field of disability law, Fothergill said, not least because all such cases tend to be settled out of court.
“Class actions are often used here in product liability cases but disability lawyers don’t often think in that way. We’ve looked at possibility of class actions but the cases that we have always get settled, so we’ve never really got to that stage.”
Whatever happens, the fact that a company with such a high profile worldwide is being sued anywhere is bound to have an effect on corporate behaviour and lobby campaigns elsewhere, she said.
“The Target case got more publicity probably among IT professionals than it necessarily did among blind people, but this case is more likely to raise the profile of access issues with those responsible for services and websites around the world, which can only be a good thing wherever you are.”
Disney is connected with a huge range of public-facing websites including sites for media partners ESPN and the ABC television network.
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=633
+02: Digital Inclusion Course Closure ‘Sets Dangerousprecedent’.
The closure by Middlesex University of the first ever European MSc course in digital inclusion after just one year of operation sets a “dangerous precedent” for those trying to establish a business case for accessibility, the academic leading the course has told E-Access Bulletin.
The unique two-year part-time course was launched by Middlesex last year. Its curriculum included the social, ethical and business case for accessibility; regulations and standardisation; web accessibility; and inclusive user experience. The course’s overall goal was to improve participation in the digital society by older and disabled people as well as people at social disadvantage such as unemployed people, people on low incomes and those with low literacy.
However after just eight people joined the programme the university has decided that no more will now be taken on and the course will close when the current set of students – who include four public sector workers – have graduated. To make the course financially sustainable a minimum of 20 students a year would have been needed.
Gill Whitney, digital inclusion programme leader at Middlesex, told E-Access Bulletin the lack of demand for the course signalled a serious problem for the development of accessible digital services in the UK and beyond.
“Losing the MSc programme due to low student numbers sets a dangerous precedent - if there is truly no demand, then there is no business case for offering similar specialist programmes elsewhere”, Whitney said.
“Designing and developing more accessible systems depends on having suitable training or education courses in place for those involved in all aspects of the development process”, she said. “The essential element is to convince students of the value of taking such courses, for example better job opportunities for both students and disabled people.
“There is now recognition of e-accessibility at a political level, with the government setting up an e-accessibility forum, but we also need industry, not-for-profits and government bodies to demonstrate there is a market demand and that there will be better jobs for professionals who genuinely understand the complexities of delivering accessible ICT, systems and services.”
Whitney said options other than the MSc course could also play a role in the educational mix, such as better integration of accessibility issues into mainstream technology courses or offering short professional development courses or diplomas that enhance existing skills. But whatever the solutions, action was needed to ensure student demand, she said.
"There is a strong need for this sort of training to make accessibility happen.”
One of the course’s students, Big Lottery Fund head of new media Claudio Concha, said the course had already proven valuable in his work.
"Inclusive design is pretty much taken for granted in architecture and product design, yet online content and digital channels still suffer from a lack of user-centred development and there is a complete lack of consideration for disabled and older people,” Concha said.
"This course has helped me understand the gulf that exists between content producers and organisations on one side and the reality of customers with differing needs on the other. It has allowed me to influence design and development projects with an authority that comes with real experience."
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=631 .
+03: Rnib To Launch Largest Ever Web Testing Exercise.
The RNIB is set to conduct its largest ever manual website accessibility testing exercise later this year, when it will check all 433 UK local authority sites against a specially-devised set of criteria.
The project will form the charity’s latest contribution to the annual ‘Better Connected’ review of UK council websites conducted by the public sector Society of IT Management (Socitm).
In previous years RNIB has run initial automated accessibility tests on all the sites, only carrying out more detailed manual assessment on those passing a certain threshold. This year, however, it will carry out manual checks on all sites based on attempts to perform three practical tasks on each such as paying council tax or renewing a library book online. A few other random top level pages will also be checked.
Marco Ranon, Principal Web Accessibility Consultant at RNIB, told a recent Socitm seminar in London the tests would not use a checklist approach against all the principles of the internationally accepted ‘WCAG [web content accessibility guidelines] 2.0’. Instead, though the guidelines would be used as a reference, the performance of tasks would be rated from 0-3 against 14 criteria such as presence of ; unique and informative page titles; and clear labels on forms, Ranon said. Some criteria such as the presence of keyboard shortcuts for tasks would be considered essential “showstoppers”, whose absence would spell failure of the test as a whole – again with close reference to WCAG, he said.
“Web accessibility is not about going through every page, unless you have a very small website,” Ranon told E-Access Bulletin this week.” You have templates and then try to educate content people. This is the largest group exercise we do as a team, and conformance testing with WCAG 2 takes a long time, so it was not practical.”
‘Better Connected’ reviews are carried out in November and December, with all results including accessibility test results due to be published at the end of February 2012.
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=629 .
++News in Brief:
+04: Official Forum:
The UK government’s ‘e-Accessibility Forum’, a group of civil servants and advisers tasked with developing policy to support the improvement of public websites, IT equipment and online content to suit the needs of disabled people, is meeting next week to update its action plan. Monday’s meeting, which will be attended by minister for culture, communications and creative industries Ed Vaizey, will examine EU and UK government accessibility standards; accessible consumer technology and digital equipment; website services and accessible content: http://www.culture.gov.uk/what_we_do/telecommunications_a nd_online/7782.aspx Short link: http://bit.ly/j8Z7sc
+05: Cloud Conversion:
Trials have been successfully run of a prototype open source live document translation system that allows users to transfer files between devices while simultaneously converting them into more accessible formats including audio versions and larger text sizes. ‘MyDocStore’ uses cloud computing to allow people to convert files easily, including to mobile devices such as smartphones. The system’s developers – assistive technology specialist iansyst, Southampton University and Raspberry Software - gained trial funding from the ‘Plain Sailing’ competition run by the government’s Small Business Research Initiative (SBRI) to develop technologies to suit specific public sector and educational needs. The partners are now waiting to hear by the end of this month if funding for phase two development of a marketable system will be made available: http://www.jisctechdis.ac.uk/techdis/news/detail/2011/SBRI_res ult Short link: http://bit.ly/kz8Pk7 .
+06: Descriptive Guidance:
A guide to describing TV programmes and films for vision-impaired people has been published by Canadian non-profit body Media Access Canada. The first of six chapters that are planned to build into an ‘Accessible content best practices guide for digital environments’, the descriptive video production and presentation guide is ‘open source’, and will be updated regularly based on comments received. Further chapters will cover issues including closed captioning techniques: http://www.mediac.ca/proj-ACBPG.asp .
[Section One ends].
++Section Two: 'The Inbox'- Readers' Forum.
Please email all contributions or responses to: email@example.com .
+07: Refreshing Response:
In last issue’s Inbox Tas wrote in to ask if anyone knew of a free or cheap screenreader programme that will work alongside the Tieman CombiBraille 98 refreshable Braille unit.
In response Ari from South Africa wrote: “For Tas, tell her to try the Cobra Braille screen reader from Baum ( http://www.baum.de ), it works with many old displays. You can try it as a demo first to see if it’s OK for you. I think there in the UK it is sold by Pamtrad ( http://www.pamtrad.co.uk ).
Tas received this advice gratefully and has emailed Baum, and promised to update us on the results. In thanking Ari she said: “It’s amazing that someone on the other side of the world can help me like this. I am really grateful to you for taking the time to pass on your help.”
[Further responses please to firstname.lastname@example.org].
+08: Google Gaps:
Our regular correspondent Brian Gaff, who is on the committee of the Kingston upon Thames Association for the Blind, writes in to grumble about accessibility issues relating to Google services.
“Judging by the comments in the Google group ‘accessible’ it seems that Google have painted themselves into a corner with their new online apps like Google Plus and Google Docs,” Gaff says. “Half of them won't work with most basic screenreaders and so they add ChromeVox to their Chrome browser. Hardly what blind folk would want, to have to alter access technology just to use Google’s stuff.
“The failing here surely is that the folk writing the code are not aware enough of what works and what does not for blind access. It’s sad that in this age we are still saying that the writers of code are not educated in making sites that just work out of the box, so to speak.
“Surely in this age when people want more users to generate more revenue, it ought to be a no-brainer to get as many folk as possible to be able to use web sites, software and online systems, but it seems it’s not. We are invisible I suspect.
“I block Google’s ads now as they persist in trying to sell me Venetian blinds... grin.”
[Responses please to email@example.com].
[Section Two ends].
++Sponsored Notice: Adept Transcription- Alternative Formats At Affordable Prices.
When you want alternative formats for disabled colleagues, customers and staff, call Adept.
Formats we produce include audio, audio description, Braille, BSL, Easy Read, e-docs for websites, large print, Makaton, Moon and sub-titles, at prices from a penny a word.
Whether handling a newsletter, training DVD, equality scheme, public service leaflet, contract or consultation, we provide: - One-stop shop for all formats - Products quality-checked by users - Corporate presentation including your house style - Fast turnaround of one document or thousands - Multi-format discounts - Accessible packaging
Contact us at: Tel: 0208 133 5418 (precede with 18001 for typetalk) Email firstname.lastname@example.org
[Sponsored Notice ends].
++Section Three: Opinion- Accessible kids’ computer games.
+09: Serious Funby Donna Jodhan.
Each time I hear those commercials on TV of kids having fun with learning games, I ask myself how much of this is or can be available to blind and sight-impaired children. The truth is that, as modern technology develops, we find that more and more blind children are struggling to keep up when it comes to being able to enjoy the excitement and fun. But with more and more toy manufacturers coming out with nifty ways for kids to learn to read, write, do maths and spell, blind and sight- impaired kids need to be given ways to enjoy all of this as well.
It’s true that some major strides have been made in making mainstream games – whether educational or otherwise – more available and accessible to blind and sight-impaired kids but there is a great deal more that needs to be done. Blind and sight-impaired kids need to be able to access more mainstream technology. In short, they need to have equal access to whatever game or learning tool is out there for the mainstream kid.
Some strides have been made in the area of ball games; a beeping baseball or hockey puck, a beeping ball for lawn tennis, and look how Goalball has been developed for blind people. So all is not lost.
So progress continues to be made.
For example Spoonbill Software, run by “happily retired computer programmer” Ian Humphreys in Albany, Western Australia, now offers some 18 free computer games for sighted, vision-impaired and blind players. The Spoonbill’s newest accessible game, BG Codebreaker, substitutes all the letters of the alphabet with numbers and then invites you to decode words. You can browse all 18 game descriptions here: http://www.spoonbillsoftware.com.au/blindgamers.htm
Other useful sites include AudioGames.net, a portal for games based entirely on sound: http://www.audiogames.net
Accessible chess puzzles, hosted by Mario Lang: http://delysid.org/chess/epd.cgi
And One Switch, a gaming resource for people with physical and learning disabilities: http://www.oneswitch.org.uk
So can we allow ourselves to dream and hope that the blind children of tomorrow will have a better opportunity to move a bit closer to the mainstream world of games and toys? That they will have more to choose from and that they will be able to enjoy them that much more? Will they have a greater chance to participate in mainstream fun or will they continue to lag behind and need substitute games and toys?
I am sure that as time goes on, more and more toys and games manufacturers will develop products that are more accessible. Products that will benefit all kids. This may even be closer to becoming a reality than many would think, though we can lend a hand by lobbying these companies to move in the right direction.
NOTE: Donna Jodhan is an accessibility consultant who is involved in an ongoing legal battle with the Canadian government over accessibility of its websites (see E-Access Bulletin, September issue). And Donna’s blog is at: http://www.donnajodhan.blogspot.com/
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=626
[Section Three ends].
++Sponsored Notice: Accessify Forum- Six Years of Accessibility Discussion.
Accessify Forum has been the number one destination for accessibility discussion on the web for nearly six years. Celebrating our sixth birthday next month, you’ll find discussion of accessibility at all levels, from beginner to guru.
The site has recently been redesigned and the forum system improved. This is still ongoing and you can join in the discussions.
So whether you’re looking to learn more about accessibility, want to help others and improve on your own knowledge, or just to browse the archives, come and join us at: http://www.accessifyforum.com/
[Special notice ends].
+How to Receive the Bulletin.
+How to Receive the Bulletin.
To subscribe to this free monthly bulletin, email email@example.com with 'subscribe eab' in the subject header. You can list other email addresses to subscribe in the body of the message. Please encourage all your colleagues to sign up! To unsubscribe at any time, put 'unsubscribe eab' in the subject header.
Please send comments on coverage or leads to Dan Jellinek at: firstname.lastname@example.org .
Copyright 2011 Headstar Ltd http://www.headstar.com . The Bulletin may be reproduced as long as all parts including this copyright notice are included, and as long as people are always encouraged to subscribe with us individually by email. Please also inform the editor when you are reproducing our content. Sections of the bulletin may be quoted as long as they are clearly sourced as 'taken from e-access bulletin, a free monthly email newsletter', and our web site address: http://www.headstar.com/eab is also cited.
- Editor: Dan Jellinek.
- Editorial advisors: Kevin Carey, Tristan Parker.
[Issue 141 ends].