A Headstar Publication. http://www.headstar.com/eab/ .
Please forward this free bulletin to others (subscription details at the end).
++Issue 144 Contents.
- 01: Tesco pledges action over inaccessible app - But customer questions why initial design was released.
- 02: Global investment plan for cheaper Braille displays - Initiative hopes to slash prices by backing innovation.
- 03: Age alliance plans digital inclusion knowledge base - Umbrella group plans to co-ordinate resources nationwide.
- News in Brief:
- 04: News in Brief: 04:
- 05: New Editions – Adobe e-book reader;
- 06: 06: Speech Square: VOICEYE document barcodes win award; 07: Free Reader – Nokia speech offering.
- Section Two, The Inbox – Readers’ Forum. 08: Petition
- 07: Blocker – government web barrier; 09:
- 08: Portable Query – pdf file access question.
- Section Three: Special Focus - Looking for work.
- 09: Ticked Off: On the face of it, Dr Norman Waddington – the holder of two PhDs – should have what it takes to be offered a job interview. But as for many disabled people, this is not proving to be the case, and accessibility issues are among the problems he faces. Dan Jellinek reports.
++Section One: News.
+01: Tesco Pledges Action Over Inaccessible App.
The UK’s largest supermarket chain Tesco has said it is taking seriously concerns raised about the inaccessibility of its new smartphone app, and is to work with the RNIB to improve the situation.
The statement was issued after E-Access Bulletin raised questions with the company about the experiences of Steph Cutler, a small business adviser and personal coach who has impaired vision. Cutler approached EAB after becoming dissatisfied with the new Tesco shopping app and with the retailer’s initial response to her complaints.
“I love the iPhone – it has really changed my life, and on the whole, the apps I’ve got are pretty usable,” she said. “So when I downloaded the Tesco app I was excited to think I could use it to shop – although their website is accessible, I find it very time-consuming. But it turns out that the app is totally inaccessible with [the iPhone’s screenreader] VoiceOver. Basically, the app says the same thing whatever product you touch.”
After Cutler asked the RNIB to take a look and they had supported her assessment, she contacted Tesco to complain, but says the company’s initial response was unsatisfactory.
“I emailed them and they rang me back very quickly, but the poor lad from customer services just said ‘we know it’s inaccessible’, though he didn’t seem to know what that meant. He had obviously just been told to call, and he was trying to say he accepted it didn’t work, but that it was OK. He also categorically refused to let me talk to someone else.
“I emailed again, and another email came back saying they care about accessibility – but with no details of any remedial plan.”
Subsequently, after E-Access Bulletin had made its own enquiries into the case, Tesco did produce a fuller response. A spokesperson for Tesco said: “The software used in the iPhone application is cutting edge technology and we will be always aiming to improve the functionality of the application.
“We have taken the concerns raised seriously and recently contacted the RNIB to work with them in identifying features that will improve accessibility for the product.
“At this time, we are unable to give any timescales as to when this will be completed. Any amendments to the application will need to be built and tested, and will therefore take time to complete.”
Tesco has now also been back in touch with Cutler to relay the same message, which she welcomes. “I am hoping they will be true to their word, and I do intend to monitor this one,” she said.
However, she says she still fails to understand why such a large company in the 21st century is failing to design in accessibility from the first release of a technology offering such as their new app.
“One argument about whether accessibility can be included is often resources, and rightly sometimes – but you just can’t say that about Tesco,” Cutler says. “We are talking about a massive retailer for whom resources aren’t a problem. They understand some of it, because they do some of it. It made me, as a visually impaired shopper, feel a little bit second class.
“I do accept apps are new, and the accessibility might change in future, but as a user I’m discriminated against.
“The point I put to them is that at the start of anything, you have a choice – you can choose to put accessibility into how it will function. But this time, either they briefed a developer and they didn’t put any emphasis on accessibility, or the developer just didn’t do it. It is far harder for them now – they will have to change code, which will be a biggish job. But it wouldn’t be a big job if they thought about it as a matter of course and didn’t put anything out that most of our customers can’t access.”
Ultimately, she says, it is a question of leadership. ““The bottom line is I feel as if I’ve been treated less favourably for reasons of my disability. It doesn’t feel like it’s been taken seriously from the top down – it doesn’t feel like the decision- maker has taken an inclusive approach, so why should customer service?”
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=672 .
+02: Global Investment Plan For Cheaper Braille Displays.
An international plan for disability organisations and others to invest in producing a refreshable Braille device hugely cheaper than current systems on sale has obtained initial approval from the international DAISY consortium for information standards, E-Access Bulletin has learned.
The project is being led by the RNIB, which now has until the next DAISY board meeting in June to flesh out the plan. If this “charter” is passed, investors will be sought to identify and back a new device.
Refreshable Braille devices are made up of individual plastic “cells” with a grid of tiny holes through which a small rod rises and falls, triggered by an electronic current. A line of cells forms into a line of Braille as a computer reads across text.
As their production process is complex, cells currently cost around 100 US Dollars each, and mark-ups are high among the few firms which manufacture displays. With typical displays carrying 32, 40 and even 80 cells, overall costs soon spiral into thousands of dollars.
Kevin Carey, chair of RNIB, said this month there are already currently as many as 34 technical ideas in outline or prototype format at universities worldwide, any of which might lead to the desired goal of a cheap Braille display roughly the size of a stick of rock that could plug into the side of an e-book player.
“We need to narrow these 34 down to two or three – and ideally go down to one - and get massive investment in to bring prices down below 25 US Dollars per cell”, Carey said. At the moment, no business model had been ruled in or out for investment, production and sales, including models requiring mass pre-ordering and the involvement of existing major incumbent players in the Braille display market.
Carey first floated the plan in an address to last year’s “Braille21” congress hosted by the World Blind Union in Leipzig, Germany.
He told the congress a cheap display would “save massive amounts from hard copy Braille production which can be ploughed back into expanding the range of files on offer and into providing displays cheap or free to individuals.”
Anticipating complaints about market interference, Carey told the Leipzig conference the high prices operated in a similar way to a cartel, requiring intervention. “There are some who say that organisations of and for the blind should not become involved in the access technology market but the current cartel does not have an automatic right to exist. For the last 30 years of its operations the price of Braille displays has fallen slowly when most other consumer electronics prices have plunged.”
Ultimately, the very survival of Braille as a language could be at stake, he warned. “If Braille is to survive into the 21st Century, it will have to re-invent itself as a mass medium, simpler, cheaper and easier to render... unless we face up to these challenges, Braille will die”.
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=670 .
+03: Age Alliance Plans Digital Inclusion Knowledge Base.
A plan to create an online “knowledge base” of resources relating to digital inclusion for older people is being drawn up by Age Action Alliance, an umbrella group of companies and charities led by the Department for Work and Pensions.
The alliance ( http://ageactionalliance.org/ ), whose members include the BBC, Microsoft, mobile network Three, Age UK and the digital inclusion charity for older people Digital Unite, has tasked a working group with drawing up a “starter strategy” for the knowledge base covering its potential usefulness, purpose and viability. It will then make a final decision on whether to go ahead with the project at the next meeting of its digital inclusion group in February.
“The aim of the knowledge base is to gather in one place the mass of extensive and varied research, analysis and evaluation data on activities and projects that have, and still are, delivering and facilitating digital literacy for older people”, Emma Solomon, managing director of Digital Unite and the groups’ chair, said this month. “The aim is also to gather – or at least signpost – practitioners to a variety of tools and resources that can help them deliver or facilitate digital inclusion for older people.”
The knowledge base will be aimed at all practitioners and promoters of digital inclusion for older people, Solomon said. “These may be formal intermediaries, informal intermediaries and individuals as well as organisations and businesses from third, private and public sectors.”
As a separate project, the group also hopes to help co-ordinate the promotion of all actions, events and activities that promote digital inclusion to older people by creating a searchable national database of all campaigns, outreach projects, learning and engagement activities in which older people are being encouraged and supported to embrace digital technologies, she said.
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=667 .
++News in Brief:
+04: European Question:
Consultation on the possible creation of a European Accessibility Act has been launched by the European Commission. In an accompanying communication, the commission defines accessibility as meaning that “people with disabilities have access, on an equal basis with others, to the physical environment, transportation, information and communications including technologies and systems (ICT), and other facilities and services in line with Article 9 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities”. It seeks to identify which goods and services that should be covered, suggesting key areas could include bank cash machines (ATMs); health and emergency services; and online services to buy public transport services or book tickets for cultural or sport events. Provisions of any eventual act could include harmonising accessibility requirements across Europe, it says. Consultation runs to 29 February 2012, including an online questionnaire: Short link: http://bit.ly/uuIp0w Long link: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/discrimination/opinion/11 1207_en.htm
+05: New Editions:
A new accessible version of the Adobe Digital Editions e-book software reader has been released in a trial format. The preview release of Adobe Digital Editions 1.8.1, which reads e-books created in the popular EPUB open standard, works for the first time with the JAWS and NVDA screenreaders for Windows and VoiceOver on Mac. It is also able to access book content character by character and word by word, and is designed to work with other Windows and Apple accessibility features including high contrast. The new reader currently lacks some features of its previous version 1.7, however, such as printing and hardware device support. Adobe says future releases will incorporate more of the old features while maintaining accessibility improvements: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/digitaleditions1-8/
+06: Speech Square:
VOICEYE, a software system that allows documents to be stored in tiny bar codes just 1 centimetre square so a decoder can convert them instantly to speech, large print or coloured text, has won the ICT Special Educational Needs category of this year’s BETT awards for education technology presented by the annual BETT conference in London. The software, developed in South Korea and distributed in the UK by Forcentenco, means ordinary paper documents can also include the code in the top corner allowing users with free Android or iPhone apps to access the same data in accessible formats: http://www.bettawards.com
+07: Free Reader:
Mobile phone maker Nokia has launched a free screen reader for some of its devices. Nokia Screen Reader can be downloaded from Nokia’s “Ovi” web portal and currently runs on three smartphones running the Symbian Belle operating system: the C5 5MP, 700 and 701 handsets. The reader was created by Spanish access software specialists Code Factory as a simplified version of the company’s Mobile Speak application: Short link: http://bit.ly/v1c5XE Long link: http://store.ovi.com/content/224364?clickSource=search& ;pos= 1
[Section One ends].
++Section Two: 'The Inbox'- Readers' Forum.
Please email all contributions or responses to: email@example.com .
+08: Petition Blocker:
David Bates, executive officer at the National Federation of the Blind (NFB) UK, writes in with a tale of democratic barriers for screen-reader users.
“A few weeks ago I received an email from a blind colleague inviting me to sign a petition on the UK government e-petitions website (http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/ )”, Bates says.
“I read the petition, filled in my name and details and was then instructed to ‘type in the two words below’. I realised that this referred to a graphic ‘captcha’ test which my screen-reader could not see, but below was an invitation to open an audio challenge instead.
“Pressing enter started an audio playback with a group of people talking overlaid by a voice reading out several words. I selected the two clearest words and typed them into the required field, but my entry was rejected, as were my 10 subsequent attempts. I then tried both the “Help” and “Accessibility” links and was told how wonderfully accessible the website was, but this information didn’t help.
“I later repeated this story to a sighted colleague who opened the site while we were talking on the phone. She said the ‘captcha’ text was easy to read but found the audio much more difficult to decipher. But she also said that on the page there were two links to either replay the audio file or to download it. This sounded very useful, but unfortunately my screen-reader could not detect these links, so I reluctantly left the site without recording my signature.
“I understand that less than 20% of blind people in the UK are able to use a computer, or to visit a national or local government website. I wonder what percentage of the general public who visit a government website need to use an audio captcha, and what percentage of these visually disabled people are actually successful?”
+09: Portable Query:
Reader G F Mueden from New York, New York writes in to add to our recent discussions about the accessibility of Adobe pdf files.
“I have read about pdf and accessibility, but it is all from the creator's point of view,” he writes. “They are not specific about what I can do to have the copy suit my eyes.
“In charity websites I have been offered annual reports in pdf and have been unable to read them because I need 2X magnification with word wrap for my poor acuity, and choice of font for my poor contrast sensitivity. How can the reader tell if a file is accessible? If accessible, how do you approach it to use the adjustments he needs? As normally presented, what you see is not what you would see if you were in the full Adobe Reader, it is bare bones with no suggestion of accessibility adjustments. My guess is that you save it, leave the website, open Reader, then open the pdf. But before doing that I want to know if it will be worth the effort. Are they marked? Would the copy have to say?
“I believe that the alternative is to save it and use a file converter. I would love to read user experience on this. I don't want to complain to the charities, I want to be helpful and let them know what they can do to help me without it being a burden to them.”
[Responses please to firstname.lastname@example.org].
[Section Two ends].
++Sponsored Notice: Adept Transcription- Alternative Formats At Affordable Prices.
When you want alternative formats for disabled colleagues, customers and staff, call Adept.
Formats we produce include audio, audio description, Braille, BSL, Easy Read, e-docs for websites, large print, Makaton, Moon and sub-titles, at prices from a penny a word.
Whether handling a newsletter, training DVD, equality scheme, public service leaflet, contract or consultation, we provide: - One-stop shop for all formats - Products quality-checked by users - Corporate presentation including your house style - Fast turnaround of one document or thousands - Multi-format discounts - Accessible packaging
Contact us at: Tel: 0208 133 5418 (precede with 18001 for typetalk) Email email@example.com
[Sponsored Notice ends].
++Section Three: Special FocusLooking for work.
+10: Ticked Offby Dan Jellinek.
On the face of it, Dr Norman Waddington – the holder of not just one, but two PhDs – should have what it takes to be offered a job interview. But like many disabled people – he is blind – this is not proving to be the case.
Early last year the government launched a programme of Incapacity Benefit reassessment, under which recipients of the benefit as well – as well as those in receipt of Severe Disablement Allowance or Income Support paid on the grounds of incapacity – were required to have their eligibility reassessed by undergoing a new "Work Capability Assessment".
Anyone assessed as capable of working were moved on to Job Seekers’ Allowance or - for those with limited capability for work - Employment Support Allowance.
While Waddington accepts this is fair, he says the way the system has worked for disabled people is in danger of swinging from one extreme to another – from a situation where people were left isolated on benefits with no options, to one where they are being moved off benefits when the work may not be there.
“When I was pushed onto it at the age of 34, it was a bitter pill to swallow to be told you weren’t fit to work, when you knew you were. Now the tables have turned – they want people off incapacity benefit and back onto Employment Support Allowance and back into work. If you look at the small print in the DWP stuff, it seems you are likely to get benefit cuts after six months, but it’s not clear. The Jobcentre people don’t know what’s going on.”
Waddington has not worked since 1993, when he was made redundant from a white collar post at the Sellafield nuclear plant. Since then he has done some voluntary work, and looked for other jobs sporadically but since the benefit changes in Easter has been searching intensively.
“I must receive 1,000 job list emails a week now, people don’t realise the time it takes to plough through them with a screen reader,” he says. But despite having applied for some 800 jobs in that time, and despite his PHDs – in biodiversity science and clinical animal behaviour – he is yet to be shortlisted for any post.
“You get a bog-standard letter, saying you’re not successful on this occasion – they don’t say why. It’s soul-destroying. These email lists with jobs – sighted people can scan down them quickly, but we’ve got to go down it and read it all – people have no knowledge of the time it takes. And the time it takes to do an application, to use a screen-reader, cutting and pasting – for someone who didn’t have the computer knowledge I do it would be impossible.
“It’s as if they’re not aware of the time and effort it takes. They don’t want to know or they don’t want to know. And if you put it all in a covering letter, explaining about Access to Work, it’s as if they just throw your application out – though I can’t prove that’s the case.”
It is now up to the government to work out how to make the system fairer, he said.”They need to close the loopholes. The classic is the two-tick system, by which if an applicant meets the job criteria and is disabled, they are bound by law to give you an interview. So they just don’t shortlist you, they say you don’t meet criteria. Something needs to be done.”
The problems don’t stop there –applying for jobs in the first place can be made all but impossible by inaccessible online forms for job applications, he says. Recently he encountered a problem with an online application form on a local authority site, for example, which featured a visual icon to call up an interactive calendar for applicants to select dates such as start dates and end dates of previous jobs.
“Using JAWS for windows, you can’t access it. They very grudgingly sent me a word copy of an application form, but how accessible that will be, I’m not sure. They say they can’t accept a CV and a covering letter for application, even though under the Disability Discrimination Act you have an obligation to find an alternative method. The Jobcentre people say this is wrong, but I think half the forms I send are not getting to the people they should be. If they’re not meeting the admin criteria, they’re just scrapped.”
The Jobcentre itself is not providing enough information in accessible formats either, Waddington says. “People could possibly lose benefit, because it says in the small print you can lose £26 a week after six months. I went on it in September, so after March I could lose benefit if I don't turn up for the Jobcentre interviews, or take up any placements they offer. But you don’t get this information in a format you can read.
“After my last Jobcentre interview, they said do I want a typed transcript – I said I couldn’t see it, can you email it to me? They said no, their computer system doesn’t talk to the internet. Then they gave me a whole load of leaflets I can't see – I had asked for Braille, but it’s not available.”
Undeterred, Waddington says he will carry on trying to find work. “Obviously if I can get back into work I will get back into work. You can't let it get to you – you’ve just got to keep on trying.”
- Comment on this story now, on EAB Live: http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=665 .
[Section Three ends].
++Sponsored Notice: Accessify Forum- Six Years of Accessibility Discussion.
Accessify Forum has been the number one destination for accessibility discussion on the web for nearly six years. Celebrating our sixth birthday next month, you’ll find discussion of accessibility at all levels, from beginner to guru.
The site has recently been redesigned and the forum system improved. This is still ongoing and you can join in the discussions.
So whether you’re looking to learn more about accessibility, want to help others and improve on your own knowledge, or just to browse the archives, come and join us at: http://www.accessifyforum.com/
[Special notice ends].
+How to Receive the Bulletin.
+How to Receive the Bulletin.
To subscribe to this free monthly bulletin, email firstname.lastname@example.org with 'subscribe eab' in the subject header. You can list other email addresses to subscribe in the body of the message. Please encourage all your colleagues to sign up! To unsubscribe at any time, put 'unsubscribe eab' in the subject header.
Please send comments on coverage or leads to Dan Jellinek at: email@example.com .
Copyright 2012 Headstar Ltd http://www.headstar.com . The Bulletin may be reproduced as long as all parts including this copyright notice are included, and as long as people are always encouraged to subscribe with us individually by email. Please also inform the editor when you are reproducing our content. Sections of the bulletin may be quoted as long as they are clearly sourced as 'taken from e-access bulletin, a free monthly email newsletter', and our web site address: http://www.headstar.com/eab is also cited.
- Editor: Dan Jellinek.
- Editorial advisors: Kevin Carey, Tristan Parker.
[Issue 144 ends].