<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile accessibility: moving with the times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=1095</link>
	<description>Access to technology for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 16:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Leicester</title>
		<link>http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=1095&#038;cpage=1#comment-7013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard Leicester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=1095#comment-7013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may see a pattern developing here!
I&#039;m totally convinced those &#039;professionals&#039; dependent on Assistive Technologies are ruled out of much of the IT development world (eg. programming).
I also see different ways to respond to stories, implying some issues are for general comment while others require journalist review/response.
All suggests to me a totally uncordinated approach to &quot;accessibility&quot;.
Appreciate that may not be a popular view, and I have many &#039;idols&#039; and friends in the accessibility world.
But I do appear to have a case, which may also be the reason for slow &#039;accessibility&#039; uptake in other sectors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may see a pattern developing here!<br />
I&#8217;m totally convinced those &#8216;professionals&#8217; dependent on Assistive Technologies are ruled out of much of the IT development world (eg. programming).<br />
I also see different ways to respond to stories, implying some issues are for general comment while others require journalist review/response.<br />
All suggests to me a totally uncordinated approach to &#8220;accessibility&#8221;.<br />
Appreciate that may not be a popular view, and I have many &#8216;idols&#8217; and friends in the accessibility world.<br />
But I do appear to have a case, which may also be the reason for slow &#8216;accessibility&#8217; uptake in other sectors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
