<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global investment plan for cheaper Braille displays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?feed=rss2&#038;p=670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=670</link>
	<description>Access to technology for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 16:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Blazie</title>
		<link>http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=670&#038;cpage=1#comment-6668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Blazie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 16:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=670#comment-6668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tim.

who is the Cartel now days?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim.</p>
<p>who is the Cartel now days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Connell</title>
		<link>http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=670&#038;cpage=1#comment-6327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Connell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=670#comment-6327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can someone direct me to the facts about RNIB&#039;s track record in supporting and developing new technology? 

I would applaud this move if it is intended to support an innovative for-profit company because over the last 30 years they have been far more successful at delivering improvements in technology than the not-for-profit sector.

In fact it is agencies like RNIB that have perpetuated out-dated, retrograde products such as the Perkins Brailler through endorsement and subsidies, and ignoring many new options for Braille that consequently never get the mass market (a very limited one at that)exposure that leads to lower prices and improved products.

My company developed a low cost alternative Braille display several years ago that neither the RNIB nor members of the so-called &quot;cartel&quot; showed the slightest interest it.

This could be a very exciting development however great leadership comes from acknowledging ones own shortcomings.

Tim]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone direct me to the facts about RNIB&#8217;s track record in supporting and developing new technology? </p>
<p>I would applaud this move if it is intended to support an innovative for-profit company because over the last 30 years they have been far more successful at delivering improvements in technology than the not-for-profit sector.</p>
<p>In fact it is agencies like RNIB that have perpetuated out-dated, retrograde products such as the Perkins Brailler through endorsement and subsidies, and ignoring many new options for Braille that consequently never get the mass market (a very limited one at that)exposure that leads to lower prices and improved products.</p>
<p>My company developed a low cost alternative Braille display several years ago that neither the RNIB nor members of the so-called &#8220;cartel&#8221; showed the slightest interest it.</p>
<p>This could be a very exciting development however great leadership comes from acknowledging ones own shortcomings.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
