Comments on: Web Content Accessibility Checker Pitched At Wider Audience http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=834 Access to technology for all Sun, 01 Apr 2018 16:32:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1 By: Mike Gifford http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=834&cpage=1#comment-6678 Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:07:48 +0000 http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=834#comment-6678 This is a great project, because it is open source. It does take a while to build and maintain any test. Folks should consider adding to the issue queue if they find tests that are insufficient:
https://github.com/kevee/quail/issues

It’s a great start to get content editors more aware of the accessibility challenges of their work. No automated tool will catch everything though.

]]> By: steve faulkner http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=834&cpage=1#comment-6672 Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:22:31 +0000 http://www.headstar.com/eablive/?p=834#comment-6672 While the concept of quail is interesting the default guideline set contains a significant amount of tests that are out of date and/or incorrect, which may lead to developers into unnecessary code additions and/or additions that do not have the desired benefit. Until the default set of tests match reality Quail should be treated with extreme caution.

]]>